Houston

  Defense Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Defense
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Criminal Defense News

 

Williams Power Company, Inc., To Pay $50 Million Penalty To Resolve Criminal Allegations

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Williams Power Company Inc. (WPC), a Delaware corporation, has entered into an agreement with the government resolving an ongoing federal investigation into the submission of knowingly inaccurate reports by WPC concerning a commodities market, Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher of the Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Kevin V. Ryan of the Northern District of California announced today. Under the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, WPC – a wholly owned subsidiary of Tulsa, Oklahoma-based the Williams Companies, Inc. (Williams) – will pay a $50 million penalty to the U.S. Treasury.

WPC has accepted and acknowledged responsibility for the actions of its former employees, and is required by the agreement to cooperate fully with the investigation being conducted by the Fraud Section of the Criminal Division at the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Francisco. Because of the cooperation commitment and the remedial actions taken by the company to date, and in conjunction with the payment of substantial monetary fines, the Department of Justice has agreed not to file criminal charges stemming from the investigation for a 15-month period. If WPC fails to comply fully with the terms of the agreement during that 15-month period, the Department of Justice will charge WPC with delivering knowingly inaccurate reports concerning the commodities market for natural gas.

Williams, one of the largest volume-transporters of natural gas in the United States, agreed by letter to uphold the terms of the government’s agreement with its subsidiary.

According to a statement of facts filed with the agreement, between June 1998 and October 2002, traders at WPC’s East and West natural gas trading desks submitted knowingly inaccurate trade data, including fictitious trades, incorrect volumes and/or prices, and incomplete trade reports to industry publications, for the purpose of benefiting WPC’s gas trading positions. Natural gas traders use the published index prices to price and settle certain physical and over-the counter financial derivative natural gas transactions. Certain WPC traders also attempted to conceal the falsity of these submissions by providing misleading and inaccurate information to industry publications in response to requests to confirm reported trade information. Upon discovery of the false reporting, WPC management alerted government authorities.

This agreement follows the entry of guilty pleas to manipulation of natural gas prices in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 13(a)(2) by two former Williams traders, Brion Scott McKenna and Thomas J. Pool in the Northern District of California. “We cannot permit the reporting of false data into the energy markets to go unchecked,” said Assistant Attorney General Fisher. “The Department of Justice is committed to ensuring the integrity of our markets, including the natural gas markets.”

“The provision of false information by Williams employees in the gas trading markets gave an unfair and illegal advantage to the company, while disrupting the appropriate functioning of the gas markets,” said U.S. Attorney Ryan. “This agreement serves a dual purpose of sending a message of deterrence through a $50 million fine, and ensuring a mechanism for future cooperation with authorities and remedial actions.”

“This deferred prosecution demonstrates that the FBI has maintained their vigilance in the pursuit of individuals and companies who misreport gas prices that affect the California energy markets,” said Joe Ford, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in San Francisco.

Contact us now to obtain a free case review or want more information on our Houston Criminal Defense Lawyers.

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Miranda rule and Miranda rights are important
The rule, pronounced in Miranda v. Arizona, that confessions are inadmissible in a criminal prosecution if the police do not advise the suspect in custody of certain rights before questioning. The rights include: a. The right to remain silent and to refuse to answer any questions; b. The right to know that anything the suspect says can and will be used against the suspect in a court of law; c. The right to consult with an attorney and to have an attorney present during questioning; d. The right to have counsel appointed at public expense, prior to any questioning if the suspect cannot afford counsel.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Criminal cases in Houston and nationwide:

Operation Magnum Force Results in 23 Arrests
Operation Magnum Force Results in 23 Arrests in Palm Beach County

The investigation, dubbed Operation Magnum Force, involv...

Read more >


Management Of Opiate Detoxification In Jails
A 2002 national survey of 500 U.S. jails included a question about the assessment and management of opiate dependency among arrestees and inmates, ...
Read more >


About 7.8 Million Firearms Last Year 126,000 Firearms Applications Rejected
WASHINGTON, D.C. About 1.6 percent of the approximately 7,831,000 applications for firearm transfers or permits were denied by the Federal Bureau o...
Read more >


More Criminal News >

 
 

Criminal Defense Terms

 


Today's Terms

Bench warrant

Definition:
An order issued by the court for the arrest of a person

Admissible evidence

Definition:
Evidence which can legally and properly be used in court.

Assault

Definition:
A willful attempt to illegally inflict injury on or threaten a person.

More Criminal Defense Terms >

 

Criminal Defense Resources

 


Search Criminal Defense resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Criminal Defense Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Criminal Defense:

  • Financial Fraud
  • Assault and Battery
  • Homicide
  • Manslaughter
  • Juvenile Justice

More Criminal Defense Topics >

Houston Defense Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Defense attorney you should contact our Defense Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Alvin
  • Amarillo
  • Arlington
  • Austin
  • Baytown
  • Brownsville
  • Burleson
  • Carrollton
  • College Station
  • Cypress
  • Dallas
  • Del Rio
  • Desoto
  • Eagle Pass
  • Edinburg
  • El Paso
  • Flower Mound
  • Fort Worth
  • Friendswood
  • Garland
  • Grand Prairie
  • Grapevine
  • Harlingen
  • Houston
  • Irving
  • Katy
  • Laredo
  • League City
  • Lewisville
  • Mcallen
  • Mesquite
  • Mission
  • New Braunfels
  • North Richland Hills
  • Palestine
  • Pasadena
  • Pharr
  • Plano
  • Richardson
  • Richmond
  • Round Rock
  • San Antonio
  • San Benito
  • San Marcos
  • Seguin
  • Spring
  • Sugar Land
  • Victoria
  • Weslaco
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Houston Defense Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.